Innovation Portfolio Strategy: Balancing Incremental and Breakthrough Products
Innovation is widely recognized as a major driver of productivity, economic growth, and improved living standards. It represents the moment when new ideas, technologies, or organiz
May 24, 20266 min read

Written by Konstantin Dolgan, Ph.D., NPDP
Founder & CEO, Product Development Engineer
Published May 24, 2026Updated September 2, 2026
Innovation drives growth and better living standards. It turns new ideas or methods into valuable goods. It can change products, processes, or how teams work. This helps add value and use. We must see the difference between small steps and big breakthroughs. Both help our world move forward.

New products and tools help teams work much faster. They also let us do new things. Better microchips let computers do hard tasks at high speeds. Firms like Vestas also improved wind turbines. These machines now work well in many types of wind.
Innovation is not the same as invention. Invention creates a new idea. Diffusion is when people start to use it. During this phase, firms change tools to fit market needs. They add new items that make the first idea better.
Experts split innovation into incremental and radical (breakthrough) types. Breakthroughs bring in new ideas that replace old tools. Incremental types focus on steady gains. They boost quality, use, and cost. Radical change needs new skills. Small gains build on what teams already know.
Breakthroughs are hard but help firms stay ahead for a long time. Studies show that focusing only on small gains can hurt new ideas. Partnerships and joint ventures often lead to big breakthroughs. Working with units in other lands does not stop radical change.
Incremental vs. Breakthrough Innovation
We can group innovation in many ways. We look at the object, the driver, or the size of change. This talk focuses on two main groups:
- Incremental innovation: Enhancing existing solutions by improving performance, reducing cost, or expanding functionality.
- Breakthrough innovation: Introducing fundamentally new solutions that redefine markets or create entirely new ones.
The key difference lies in whether the innovation is perceived as a natural extension of existing practices or as a disruptive shift.
True breakthroughs are rare. Most new ideas build on old ones. Thomas Edison did not invent the light bulb. He made it last longer. He built the systems for wide use. This changed both work and home life.
Small changes help polish big ideas. Early versions of new goods are often costly. They also have limited uses. Small steps make them cheap and reliable. This helps them reach more buyers.
Both types of innovation are essential:
- Breakthrough innovation opens new opportunities.
- Incremental innovation captures and expands the value of those opportunities.
Without breakthrough innovation, incremental progress eventually plateaus. Without incremental innovation, breakthrough ideas fail to reach their full potential.
Four Innovation Types
A framework combining technological change and shifts in product meaning identifies four innovation types:
- Technology-push innovation
Driven by scientific or technical advances, these innovations introduce new technologies without altering the product’s meaning. Color television is a classic example.Meaning-driven innovation
These innovations redefine the symbolic or cultural meaning of a product without major technological change. The mini-skirt of the 1960s is a well-known example.Technology epiphanies
These innovations apply new or existing technologies in unexpected ways, creating new meanings or uses – such as the Nintendo Wii or Swatch watches.Market-pull innovation
These innovations originate from identified customer needs and rely on human-centered design and market research.
Dynamic Innovation and Technological Change
Tech growth moves in steps. Long periods of small gains face sudden bursts of change. These big moments break the old path. They offer better performance or lower costs.
Teams must balance exploration with exploitation. Small gains can help big ideas. Yet, stiff rules may block new thinking. Small steps build the skills needed for the next big jump.
Challenges in Achieving Breakthrough Innovation
Large firms often fail at big leaps. This is true for goods with long life cycles. Old R&D plans focus on speed and steady results. These goals can stop new trials.
Companies that excel at breakthrough innovation typically:
- Operate with a clear strategic purpose.
- Maintain a well-defined innovation strategy.
- Use structured innovation processes.
- Invest meaningfully in radical innovation.
- Explore new business models.
- Experiment with multiple innovation operating models.
- Collaborate extensively with external partners.
- Generate significant revenue from new offerings.
To improve their innovation performance, organizations must align their capabilities with long-term strategic goals.
Core Components of an Innovation Strategy
- Business and Innovation Objectives.
Companies must define what they aim to achieve through innovation and ensure alignment with broader corporate strategy. Clear direction and strong execution capabilities are essential.
Figure 2.A four-stage plan to align corporate strategy and innovation execution (source –pwc.es/es/publicaciones)
Contact us today to learn how LA NPDT can assist in realizing your project.
- Innovation Strategy
A clear plan guides your path. It helps you choose how much to innovate. It sets the mix of small steps and big leaps. It picks which areas to fund first.
Firms must choose a bold “Play to Win” strategy for leadership. Or they can pick a “Play Not to Lose” approach to stay competitive.
- Leadership
Leaders set the tone for new ideas. Without a clear vision, these efforts fall apart. Leaders define risk tolerance and goals while helping teams learn through new tests.
- Culture
A strong innovation culture requires supportive systems, incentives, and behaviors. Organizations must encourage creativity, collaboration, and experimentation until these behaviors become embedded.
- Talent
Finding and retaining innovation talent is a major challenge. Companies must identify creative individuals and provide environments that support learning, collaboration, and entrepreneurial thinking.
- Ecosystem
Innovation thrives when organizations connect with external sources of knowledge – suppliers, universities, startups, research institutions, and strategic partners. These relationships accelerate learning and expand innovation capacity.
Conclusion
Balancing incremental and breakthrough innovation is a strategic challenge that requires disciplined resource allocation, strong organizational capabilities, and effective execution. Both forms of innovation are essential and mutually reinforcing.
Small steps improve current products and boost work flow. Big breakthroughs create new markets and long-term edges. Growth relies on mixing both styles into one plan.
Organizations that successfully combine bold ambition with disciplined execution position themselves for resilience, adaptability, and long-term success.
Subscribe
Dive deep into the dynamic world of new product development with LA NPDT Insights Blog.
Innovation Type Comparison
Characteristic | Incremental Innovation | Breakthrough Innovation |
|---|---|---|
Magnitude of Change | Continuous improvements | Fundamentally new solutions |
Focus | Enhancing existing solutions | Redefining or creating new markets |
Knowledge Basis | Builds on established routines and expertise | Requires unfamiliar knowledge and new operating models |
Impact on Solutions | Improves reliability, usability, performance, or cost | Renders existing solutions obsolete |
Strategic Role | Captures and expands value | Opens new opportunities |
Allocating budget across horizons without starving the core
Managing a portfolio is mostly about how you split funds. Small tasks win over big ideas because their gains show up now. You must set a separate budget with its own rules. Set the split, share it, and check it once a year.
Horizon | Share of R&D spend | Decision rule | Primary metric |
|---|---|---|---|
Core - sustaining and cost-down | 60-70 percent | Payback under 12 months | Margin gain and defect reduction |
Adjacent - new segment or platform | 20-30 percent | Evidence of demand from three customers | Revenue from products under 3 years old |
Transformational - new business model | 5-15 percent | Learning milestones, not revenue | Validated assumptions per quarter |
Killing projects on purpose
A portfolio with no stopped projects is just a line. Good programs stop a third of new projects at the first gate. Teams must move to new work fast so failure does not hurt careers. Without this, staff keep weak projects alive to save their jobs.
- Write the kill criteria at kickoff - name the number, the date and who reads it.
- Separate the reviewer from the sponsor - the person who approved the project should not be the only one judging it.
- Reassign within two weeks - a fast landing spot is what makes honest reporting safe.
- Harvest the learning - a one-page post-mortem in a searchable place is the actual return on a cancelled project.
- Track the kill rate - if it is near zero, your gates are ceremonial.
Frequently asked questions
What is the primary difference between incremental and breakthrough innovation?
Big breakthroughs bring new ideas that can make old tools obsolete. Small steps focus on steady gains in cost or performance. The main choice is a natural extension or a big shift.
Why is breakthrough innovation important for long-term success?
Big breakthroughs are vital for a long-term edge because they open new doors. Research shows firms that only make small steps may fail to find big ideas. Growth stops if you do not seek big shifts.
How do incremental and breakthrough innovations work together?
Both types of new ideas are vital. Big shifts open doors, while small steps grow the value of those wins. Small fixes make new products reliable for all users. Big ideas need these small steps to reach their full potential.
What are some common challenges in achieving breakthrough innovation?
Large, old firms often struggle to innovate, especially with complex products. Standard R&D plans focus on efficiency. This focus can limit the tests needed for bold ideas. Successful firms use a clear goal and avoid rigid rules.
What are the four types of innovation identified in the framework?
The framework uses tech changes and product meaning to show four types. Technology-push innovation starts with science. Meaning-driven innovation changes what a product means. Technology epiphanies use tech in new ways. Market-pull innovation starts from customer needs.
Filed under:EducationUncategorized
Tagged:2025
Related articles
All articles
Industrial Design Portfolio Examples: What Reviewers Look For
A structure for an industrial design portfolio that gets read: case study anatomy, how much process to show, page counts and common rejection reasons.

Material Qualification Strategy: Reducing Risk Before Production
Modern manufacturing relies on raw materials that make it possible to produce the goods driving economic growth and improving everyday living standards. Companies depend on everyth

Engineering Trade-Offs: Balancing Cost, Performance, and Time-to-Market
In today’s fast moving landscape – defined by intense global competition, rapid technological progress, and increasingly sophisticated customer expectations – product life cy
Services related to this guide
- Product design servicesIndustrial design and CAD taken all the way to manufacturable files.
- Rapid prototypingWorking prototypes in days, from 3D printing to vacuum casting.
- Electronic design servicesSchematic, PCB layout, firmware and bring-up, through to production handoff.
- Product development examplesReal projects we designed, prototyped and shipped.